Actual Inferiority

You are what you do.

The purpose of this post is to equate the idea of “birthright superiority”- such as displayed by Nordicists - with inherited wealth and that it is corrosive of character, competence, and initiative.

First, read my post on the White Date fiasco, and make sure you read the comments in which more information is provided.

As background, laugh at this. We observe smug Nordicist gibbering that is amusing in the context of the catastrophic affirmative action ineptness displayed by her projects and her hiring Indians and Arabs to help run the sites. This specimen is a parody, a perfect representative of all the “movement” tropes I mock.

Also of relevance to the idea of “smugness” is this.

Therefore, in summary, in addition to Racial Proximity Theory, here I propose “racial smugness” – a self-satisfied arrogant racial complacency – to explain Nordic attitudes toward Coloreds. This hypothesis can be further analyzed, dissected, critiqued, proofed, and extended.

As an example of all of this, thus:

There are several Indian freelancers involved who all live in India, but WhiteDate has mainly been developed by one Indian webmaster with whom I have been working together on various online projects for almost ten years. We have never personally met but I highly appreciate his competence and fine personality. Our server is managed by competent Arabic men, who live in Arabic countries.

Now consider the following brief, yet useful, AI summary as to why inherited wealth is corrosive of character:

Inherited wealth can damage character by providing financial security that may lead individuals to lack purpose or motivation, as they may not experience the challenges that often build resilience and work ethic. Additionally, it can create a sense of entitlement, which may hinder personal growth and responsibility.

Now let us go back to my racial smugness essay:

…the more representative and central individuals are too comfortable and too self-satisfied in their identities – a sense of “racial smugness” may be in play here. Thus, these people feel overly secure in their ancestry and phenotype, they therefore do not feel threatened by the lesser types who they view with condescending attitudes and/or pity; indeed, they may feel a sense of noblesse oblige toward non-Whites (while they despise non-Nordic Whites who they see as competitors – not quite their equal but not deserving of the kindness bestowed upon Coloreds). This is a form of “The White Man’s Burden” that the High Trusters have, which is derived from “racial smugness.”

And remember my idea that superiority has to be earned; it is not a birthright (from ancestry, phenotype, or whatever).

Putting this all together, we can make an analogy in which, as I stated above, the idea of birthright superiority - such as displayed by Nordicists - is akin to inherited wealth and is corrosive of character, competence, and initiative. This sense of entitlement is amplified by Der Movement’s affirmative action program that privileges Anglo, Germanic, Nordic, NW European types regardless of how inept they are.

Thus, these types are smug in their self-declared innate superiority, but not having to face the challenges of other White types they lack the motivation for self-improvement, resulting in sloppy incompetence and an indulgent attitude toward Coloreds. They don’t need to put the work in like the rest of us, you see; they are entitled to leadership due to their masterful racial superiority, after all, and who cares if they lurch from one catastrophe to another because of their incompetence and piss-poor judgment.

Just like a spoiled rich kid living off familial wealth and achieving nothing on their own, these affirmative action Nord types are spoiled recipients of their supposed inherited racial superiority.

But, guess what – you are not obligated to accept their inflated sense of self and you are not obligated to accept their racially-astroturfed “leadership.” You don’t have to be victimized by their failures; you don’t have to accept endless years and decades of constant losing.

Instead of “leaders” who are akin to a whining, entitled, spoiled rich kid perhaps you need to look toward those who rose up without an affirmative action program and achieves on their own, and displays better judgment than those whose byword is comical catastrophe.

You are what you do. Thus, they manifest actual inferiority.