Groupuscule Goals
For 2026 and beyond.
Some background:
I have long criticized cults of personality on the Right; for example, note that MAGA is essentially just Donald Trump and Trump has failed to create either a coherent ideological movement or a cohort of effective political actors as heirs to that movement. Another example is William Pierce; the National Alliance has been a joke since his death. One wonders what would have happened to German National Socialism after Hitler eventually died (whenever that would be) if the regime had survived WWII.
One reason that I went on social media was to attract active supporters to help build a viable movement centered on the principles I espouse, so that when I “shuffle off this mortal coil” there would be others to continue the cause, so the ideology would go on. The objective was precisely to prevent the “EGI Notes movement” from being a cult of personality dependent on a single individual. True enough, not wanting the groupuscule to be a cult of personality, perhaps it shouldn’t be named The Sallis Groupuscule. But what else to name it? There is no other name, no other label, that succinctly captures the essence of the ideology here, which is unique. So, instead it is named after me, linked to my ideology. Regardless of the name, the objective of attracting supporters remains the same. And as of today, the objective has failed. But it remains what I continue trying to do.
Moving forward to 2026, the basic objective remains the same, although it needs to be done on a more fundamental level, promoting the ideas even before looking for people. The first priority is to significantly increase the exposure of the ideas of The Sallis Groupuscule; there needs to be some sort of breakthrough in the impact of the ideology. Until the cordon sanitaire hemming in the groupuscule is broken, nothing else is going to be possible; obviously, the small number of supporters that exist now are not stepping forward to “carry the torch”; therefore, we need to “cast the net” further. The more people who are exposed to the ideology, the greater the chance of finding those who will commit to carrying the ideas further. How to achieve this I do not know; this will require further thought as all my attempts for a breakthrough have heretofore failed. Any additional ideas from readers are welcome. The “status quo” is not getting the job done. Slow, incremental growth is not getting the job done. We need more people to step up and help, assuming they agree with the message. And if you do not agree with the message, why are you reading it here? Entertainment? Information gathering for the opposition? In that case, the message is not for you.
And, by the way, the message has to be, and is, revolutionary, radical, uncompromising, and for Whites only, ourselves alone. You are not going to find any nonsense about “I have Jewish friends” or “these are my Black friends” here. You are not going to find Jamaican Negroes writing here, you won’t read me saying that South Asians are “interesting and agreeable people,” and you won’t hear me saying that any half-Desi is “our man in Arkansas.” If you like that then the “movement” is for you. But not what I am doing here. You are not getting mainstreaming and shilling for capitalism here either.
I suspect that there are people out there who would find the overall ideology here promising and positive but do not know about it and that needs to be rectified. Yes, there is room for further ideological development and discussion of practical strategies; however, it seems to me that there is sufficient material, sufficient foundation, for progress even with what currently exists. So the primary problem is getting the word out, “selling” the groupuscule to potentially interested parties.
Actually, the two issues are related. In order to optimally develop groupuscule ideology and strategic direction, as well as tactics, fresh perspectives from other people are required; I cannot do it all myself, some stimulation of “new blood” would be helpful. Conversely, the new ideas and perspectives thus developed may be attractive to additional people, bringing new people into the fold. Hence, expansion of the groupuscule with respect to people will be synergistic with expansion of the groupuscule from a memetic perspective.
However, this cycle has to start somewhere and that has to be with people attracted to the fundamental ideology joining and helping to build things further. Of course, any ideological development, as well as improved strategy and tactics, need to be fully consistent with the original fundamental ideology. The aim is NOT to change the foundation, NOT to alter the fundamentals, but to build on top of that fundamental foundation to add to it, not replace it in any way.
We are not going to get anywhere if you continue to DO NOTHING.