Over the Target

Greggy the fool.

Greggy the fool.

My criticism of Greggy and his employment of a Jamaican Negro is hitting home. Laugh at this:

If one of “us” can be an enemy of white interests, can one of “them” be a friend? Of course. Just as I want non-whites to have homelands of their own, there are non-whites who wish the same for whites. These are non-white allies. They are not “us,” but they can and do help us. This is why I have no patience for people who decry the fact that Counter-Currents regularly publishes writings by non-white allies of White Nationalism, while I do not publish white authors who are objectively or subjectively harmful to our cause.

I’m over the target. Obviously, Greggy has felt compelled to address this issue with his latest diatribe.

One of the main focal points of my critiquing the publishing of Colored writers is Greggy employing Jamaican Negro HBDer Lipton Matthews.

When writing for Greggy, the Lip puts forth a HBD-obsessed (in my opinion, that by itself puts him as objectively an enemy) “pro-White” “Black libertarian” “take” compatible with Counter-Currents.

See this.

See this.

Contrary to the sermons of identitarians, blacks and other minority groups are not disadvantaged. Their socioeconomic outcomes are determined by average group intelligence and non-cognitive traits that influence achievement.

See this.

African countries are less intelligent, lower in long-term orientation, and are not time-oriented, which is why it has been so hard for them to modernize. It is impossible to build wealth without capital formation, and impulsive people don’t accumulate capital.

So, there at Counter-Currents, the problem of Blacks and of Africa is that of lesser intelligence and other negative traits. After all, some must be paid:

…Greg Johnson…He also ensures that I am paid on time.

But here’s the Lipster elsewhere, with a different master:

However, many argue that geography is a major contributor to Africa’s anemic performance....”Geography is most favorable to economic production for Europe, next to America, then to Asia, and least favorable to Africa…. If it were not for the unfavorable physical environment, African countries would be better off economically than South American countries.”

In general, we are not implying that Africa’s challenges are impossible to solve. However, due to its unique geography, the region requires policies that account for its peculiar condition. As such, primacy should be accorded to improving transportation networks and reducing barriers to trading. Solving the problem of a harsh geography demands bold thinking and surely Africans are up to the task.

Uh huh. Seems to me that the writing is produced to fit the audience. Some ally. Johnson’s excuses falls flat. We can ask how “helpful” these “allies” really are. But there is a deeper issue as well. I promote an Ourselves Alone approach to White Nationalism. Putting aside the (very legitimate) argument that some, many, or most of these non-White “allies” are self-serving, we can ask – do we have ANY refuge from Color? Does even the White Nationalist cause have to be multiracial as well? Akin to how Coloreds follow Whites when Whites flee diversity via White flight, does Color have to pursue us even within the confines of White Nationalism itself? Can we never be free of them? Isn’t an attraction of White Nationalism for Whites the enjoyment of Whites-only spaces? We have “leaders” who promote the “ethnostate” but cannot keep their own websites for Whites only. Is it that some White types have to have their “Color fix?” Do you want “leaders” who are so addicted to Color that they bring Color within “this thing of ours?” Thus, it is amusing that my WDR125 podcast has been confirmed so quickly as being correct by the antics of Johnson and Taylor.

I will let readers decide how the value of my work compares to that of the gibbering of Greggy’s pet Negro. Amusingly, I used to write for Counter-Currents, including pieces that Johnson described thus:

Editor’s Note:

The following essay is one of the most important pieces published at Counter-Currents so far. I heartily endorse its analysis and invite discussion.

Even after I stopped directly writing for his site (being tired of his antics), Johnson continued reproducing EGI Notes posts at Counter-Currents (as I recall, never asking me about it), and only stopped when my criticism of him, his friend Taylor, and the rest of their failed “movement” became too much for poor, sensitive Greggy to take. As these egomaniacs equate themselves with the “movement,” criticisms of them, in their mind, equates to someone being an “objective enemy” of White interests. Of course, those they accuse of that may believe the same of them (and have the links, quotes, recordings, etc. as evidence).

Does Johnson’s self-serving babbling justify his embrace of diversity? Is it really all about “friends and enemies,” “objectve” or “subjective?”

No, as an over-sensitive effete hysteric, Greggy can’t take criticism, As a coward, he refuses debate challenges and bans critics. As someone who prioritizes page views and donations, he’ll hire the likes of Goad and the Lipster who’ll write what they need to get the shekels. As an Anglo-Nord afflicted with RPT, Greggy apparently prefers Color to uppity White ethnics.

Greggy’s may have “no patience” for people who call out his nonsense, but the calling out will continue. We are over the target; bombs away!